This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
dataarchving [2017/03/02 20:23] mgstauff [PMACS HPC:Archive System] |
dataarchving [2017/08/07 15:59] (current) mgstauff [PMACS HPC:Archive System] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
We've had good experiences with the Synology DS (DiskStation) series of RAID systems, for example the DS416. These products have a good user interface and support connection over the network via NFS (linux/ | We've had good experiences with the Synology DS (DiskStation) series of RAID systems, for example the DS416. These products have a good user interface and support connection over the network via NFS (linux/ | ||
+ | ===Mini FAQ=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Q: We want to back up our MRI data and are expecting to collect multiple terabytes of imaging data over the next few years. Do you have a specific suggestion for us? I was looking at the DS416 option from the wiki and also saw a 2-bay system== | ||
+ | |||
+ | A: The key is to have a RAID system 1 or higher, so you have redundancy if one of the drives fails. See here: https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | A two-bay system will work depending on what " | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Q: Is it possible to purchase just 1 internal hard drive for now - or would you not recommend this - and if so do you have any good brands or suggestions? | ||
+ | |||
+ | No, you want two drives at a minimum so you can at least do RAID 1. You can start with two drives, and then add more and expand the raid volume later. (At least with the Synology systems) you can start with RAID 1 and then switch to RAID 5 or 6. Also, each drive is limited to use the size of the smallest drive in the raid, so if you start with 2TB drives, you'll want to expand in the future with 2TB drives (or larger drives, but only 2TB of each one will get used). | ||
+ | |||
+ | Some real-world hard drive reliability stats: | ||
+ | https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Q: How technologically savvy to be we need to be to maintain this system. How often would we need to check our back up system? We do not plan on accessing it very often - just using it purely as a back up kept off site.== | ||
+ | |||
+ | A: A typical undergrad/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | You can set up most (or maybe all) systems to send you email alerts (and maybe text alerts) when there' | ||
==== Archive-Quality Blu-ray Discs ==== | ==== Archive-Quality Blu-ray Discs ==== | ||
Line 25: | Line 45: | ||
==== PMACS HPC:Archive System ==== | ==== PMACS HPC:Archive System ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | NOTE 8/2017 | ||
+ | | ||
+ | PMACS has new options for storage that may be of use. | ||
+ | In particular the " | ||
+ | stated ability to conform to HIPAA compliance needs. We have not had time to investigate | ||
+ | this ourselves. You are welcome to contact PMACS about this and ask our help to figure | ||
+ | out if the new services are usable by cluster users. | ||
+ | | ||
+ | http:// | ||
+ | |||
This is a service that provides very easy access to a modern robot-controlled high-availability tape archiving system. It provides a simple filesystem-view interface with simple file retrieval. Custom linux commands are provided for the user to make their archiving copies. Note that this is an **archiving** service, and is not meant to be a regular backup service. You are able to retrieve files, but such retrievals are expected to be rare. | This is a service that provides very easy access to a modern robot-controlled high-availability tape archiving system. It provides a simple filesystem-view interface with simple file retrieval. Custom linux commands are provided for the user to make their archiving copies. Note that this is an **archiving** service, and is not meant to be a regular backup service. You are able to retrieve files, but such retrievals are expected to be rare. | ||